Sunday, November 27, 2005

Paths Toward an Anti-Capitalist Liberation

In any nomination for "Most evil and inherently destructive ideology in human history", I think Islam would win. But Marxism doesn't make for a very bad second. Some at the People's Republic of Berkeley are worried that there is an attempt to "discredit Communism". Eh, wasn't that sort of done a long time ago? It's dead, but it won't lie down:



Paths Toward an Anti-Capitalist Liberation

The balanced job complex is a redefinition of our concept of work. Basically, jobs are organized so that everyone has an equal set of both empowering and un-empowering tasks. Jobs are balanced within each work place and across work places. Balancing work across work places is equally necessary so that disempowering and menial work places are not ruled by empowering ones. The outcome of the participatory balanced job complex is that everyone has an equal share of both desirable and undesirable tasks, with comparable empowerment and quality of life circumstances for all. Another key element is remunerative justice, or pay for effort and sacrifice. This method of pay insures that unequal outcomes are not produced and reproduced, due to ownership of the means of production, bargaining power, output, genetic endowment, talent, skill, better tools, more productive coworkers, environment, inheritance, or luck. Of all these factors people control only their effort. So, effort and sacrifice is the remunerative norm in parecon, tempered by need as appropriate in cases of illness, catastrophe, incapacity, etc. Participants are organized into federations of workers and consumers councils who negotiate allocation through "decentralized participatory planning". Workers in worker councils propose what they want to produce, how much they want to produce, the inputs needed and the human effects of their production choices. Consumers propose what they want to consume, how much they want to consume and the human effects of their consumption choices.


Berkeley: Mao debunkers defend their book, Critics call it effort to discredit Communism

"During the 10 years of the Cultural Revolution, he turned China into a cultural desert," she told the crowd at Haas. "He made torture public. My mother went through over a hundred of those denunciation meetings. She was made to kneel on broken glass and so on. China must be the most traumatized nation in the world." Halliday said Mao appealed to "a large group of fantasists" who gullibly thought he was the real thing. Halliday said Mao also attracted leftists who tolerated violence. Maoist intellectuals have counterattacked, saying the book negates any historical grounds for the Chinese revolution and positive changes in what had been a corrupt society before Mao's military victory in 1949. "It's just outrageous," said Gary Miller, a volunteer at Berkeley's Revolution Books, as he leafleted the authors' event on campus. "A lot of people look with a great deal of affection at the Mao years because China's been turned into one giant sweatshop." Raymond Lotta, a Chicago-based Maoist political economist and author, spoke to students at UCLA and UC Berkeley in what he called a bid to set the record straight. "What sets this apart from other historical studies is that this person Mao, who led an historic revolution and changed the landscape of China and was an inspiration throughout the world -- they're saying this was a scheming, bloodthirsty opportunist who was evil from the day he was born to the day he died and who hijacked a revolution," Lotta said. "I think it's part of a continuing attempt to discredit communism and Maoism and any alternative to the current world order."

Mao Zedong: Sacred symbol and bloodiest mass killer


Every morning, as many as 20,000 people flock to Tiananmen Square to join the vast queues of pilgrims, often stretching a kilometre long, at the entrance to the tomb of Mao Zedong. Almost 30 years after his death, Mao remains the sacred symbol that China dare not touch. His massive portrait still looms above the entrance to the Forbidden City. His face is on every banknote in the country. Yet while he continues to be worshipped in China, a shocking new book has concluded that Mao was the bloodiest mass murderer in history, a sadistic thug who enjoyed torture and was willing to sacrifice half of China's population for his dream of global domination. The book estimates that Mao caused the deaths of 70 million people in peacetime, making him a far worse killer than Hitler or Stalin. It portrays him as a sociopath who loved killing and allowed millions of peasants to starve to death while he exported food to pay for his nuclear weapons; a man whose legendary achievements in the Long March were an invention; a man who turned China into a cultural desert of misery and violence, while maintaining dozens of luxury villas and a troupe of female sexual partners. China's rulers have acknowledged that Mao made some "serious mistakes," but only "in his old age." And they continue to praise him lavishly, decades after his death.

4 Comments:

At November 27, 2005 4:29 PM, Blogger Curtis LeMay said...

fjordman,

Whydo you think we call it "Bezerkley"?!?!

 
At November 27, 2005 5:28 PM, Blogger Roy F. Moore said...

Thanks for the links on those reports regarding the human horror Mao.

However, there is an "anti-capitalist liberation" that doesn't eliminate a market economy, nor does it promote any type of socialism for fascism.

It is called DISTRIBUTISM, co-founded by English authors and journalists G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, based on Catholic social teachings.

Permit me to give you a Wikipedia link to Distributism, which contains other links for further information on it. Thank you for your time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

 
At November 27, 2005 8:00 PM, Blogger Mike said...

"At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that a true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." - Che

Anyone who quotes Che should get a date with a firing squad. After all, firing squads were one Che's favorite ways to express "great feelings of love".

 
At November 27, 2005 10:11 PM, Blogger Snouck said...

In the Netherlands political violence is more modest. Last Friday the extreme Left attacked 2 members of a Conservative thinktank. A Leftist activist was shot a week ago in Nijmegen.

Snouck
http://snouck.blogspot.com

 

Post a Comment

<< Home